hows it going, is it just the rubber O rings that have failed on the injectors ?

Spoke to Thor today.

It's back together and hopefully will be on the dynopacks tomoz.

G

Well its on the dynopacks as i type.. Heres hoping for some decent figs !

G

215@fly ?????????????

If we are guessing, I will go 205

Id say 185@wheels seeing as thats where it will have been tested.

i was thinking 185 wheels but seein as someones already nabbbed that one, ill go 180 wheels.


















i get the feeling some'ones busy strapping on some nos to try and break through the magic 200 at fly :clown:

no nos :joker:

Pretty sure 180 at the wheels will be well over 200 at the fly, transmission got to be less than 90% efficient!

Stock KV6 177 BHP @ flywheel
Stock KV6 144 BHP @ wheels
Equates to a 18.5% drive train loss = 33 BHP@flywheel

You have to remember the power loss is 33 BHP as stock,
When you increase the power the drive train loss has already been calculated and will not change because you make more power, why would your drive train make more losses beause the engine is making more power, what changed in the gearbox?
If you make 200 BHP@wheels you do not calculate 18.5% drive train losses, you add the factory 33 BHP it lost.
Do not make the mistake of adding the 18% power loss to your new figure.

To jump from 144@wheels to 200@wheels (56 WHP) is some good gains for a NASP build,