My only gripe with it is that they called it a ZS rather than assign it a new model....

Given it is so different from previous I find it bizzare that they'd call it the same thing.

Other than that I've not got anything to say about it, I'll never drive one, never own one, so not even going to bother to look at it...

I'm waiting for when it gets a few sales and we get some confused new model owners appear (and probably disappear)

Just waiting for the day when new members join expecting this 'ZS' model! :laugh:

did I read its a Mazda knock off??

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=ma...cInZt3BJiI0RM:

http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/mg/zs/9...zs-2017-review

:):):)

New members ..... not necessarily a bad thing .....

We could have a new area for the "Mk 3" ..... ?

I don't think they should have called it the ZS but doesn't look too bad. It appeals to the masses and for the brand it's what they need if we are ever going to see the MG brand survive never mind produce another 2 seater sports car

WTF are mg thinking calling it the zs . To be honest for the money and looks outside and in its not that bad I wouldn't own one though. They are so far behind the main stream brands ie ford, Vauxhall etc in the powertrain department but suppose that's why they cost so much cheaper . To sum up I,m not arsed one way or another about the new zs coz it will never interest me but calling it a zs that pisses me off . Haven't the Chinese ruined the mg brand enough without bringing back the old model names wouldn't be so bad if it were a hot hatch , saloon but an suv shame on you mg .