My MG ZS 1.8 VVC Conversion.
Hi, im new to this forum and thought i would share a few pictures of my ZS with you all, it has a 160vvc conversion and goes pretty well, any feedback welcomed, any questions then fire away, thanks. http://i1242.photobucket.com/albums/...ps6d3383de.jpg http://i1242.photobucket.com/albums/...pse65846a6.jpg http://i1242.photobucket.com/albums/...ps7d599dd8.jpg http://i1242.photobucket.com/albums/...ps13d0f50f.jpg http://i1242.photobucket.com/albums/...ps2bc9fd2e.jpg http://i1242.photobucket.com/albums/...ps20e8e9cd.jpg http://i1242.photobucket.com/albums/...psa426eb91.jpg http://i1242.photobucket.com/albums/...ps40a34943.jpg http://i1242.photobucket.com/albums/...ps9b269bb5.jpg |
I like it, quicker than a 180 would you say?
|
Quote:
|
Hello and welcome to the site, nice looking car in the best colour, a wee shame its the hatch but hey ho lol.had a go of a vvc zs belonging to another member on here and it does go very well.whereabouts are you we seem to have members scattered everywhere so most likely someone will be near you.got any other plans for it?
|
Quote:
As for future plans im hoping for a custom manifold, full exhaust with dual exits and maybe a 270 piper exhaust cam and Z&F Remap. |
Quote:
|
I'm thinking that the lighter vvc would offset the extra bhp of a v6.
|
Very nice Mathew. :hi: to the site.
|
very nice mate and welcome to the forum . Dont think there would be that much in yours and a 180 . I had a little play with a 160 zr a year or so back now and to be fair not much in it at all dont know if the 160 was standard but my 180 is
|
Nice looking car.
The V6 has more torque so will pull better at higher speeds but the VVC will be more nimble at lower speeds, just as the ZR is. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ? 2010 theMGZS.co.uk