New members car
Hi everyone,murray here.Only been on the site about a week now and just thought it would be nice to include a few pictures of my car for you all to look at.:wave:
http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/b...s/100_0193.jpg http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/b...s/100_0192.jpg http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/b...s/100_0194.jpg http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/b...s/100_0191.jpg |
:hi: Murray, nice ZS there, nice and low too!
Powered by what exactly? Couldn't read the small print! |
That is certainly low! What suspension have you got? What mods have you done to get it to 200BHP?
Here's a question... what percentage of MG Rover cars have Longbridge registration numbers?:ike: |
very nice loose the lights very good other than that are u using spax or bilsteins coilovers?
|
Nice car, i thought mine was low, but omg....:cool2::cool2:
|
very very nice!
|
Nice motor you have there Murray
|
Quote:
|
suspension?
|
Quote:
To date i have done the following to get the car to 200 bhp: Home made air intake system.i.e with the cone filter sitting under the wing where the resonator would sit(and i still think this is the best way to do the intake). Mannis back Piper exhaust system Piper 270 cams and vernier pulleys. Progress was as follows: Standard car Rolling Roaded at 173bhp Cat back exhaust and intake fitted 184 bhp Cams/Verniers fitted 203 bhp Car really responded to Cams well.Did have a Piggyback ECU fitted but it done diddly squat for the power so ended up taking it off. Although the power is not the best i feel a lot has to be said for a fairly hard suspension setup.i know its not everyones cup of tea but the responsivness of the car on excelleration with stiff springs etc is so much better than the standard stuff where a lot of that responsivness is sapped by the rear suspension. I dont know just my thoughts. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ? 2010 theMGZS.co.uk