theMGZS.co.uk :: MG ZS forum - View Single Post

Quadcam24 · 18-05-12, 09:53 PM

so many variables its never an exact science, you just have to trust that they are close and thats it........ but when youve seen 4 people sitting on a cars bonnet, because it was supposedly so powerfull it was wheel spinning on the rollers...despite having just 200ft lb, it does make you sceptical, especially when youve seen 600 bhp supras on the same rollers running fine, rflmao !

what makes you think it will have high torque ed?
personally i would expect lower torque because i know how bad the zs runs without vis and i struggle to believe all that lost torque can be recovered and then some more created just from mapping, why have the vis if it can be mapped out better without it ?
i would expect similar or maybe a nadge more torque higher up but less low down and mid range.
I have lots of modified zs roller graphs with wheels plots on, so will be interesting to compare torque when the graph is posted here.

18-05-12, 09:53 PM	#115
Quadcam24 Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 393	so many variables its never an exact science, you just have to trust that they are close and thats it........ but when youve seen 4 people sitting on a cars bonnet, because it was supposedly so powerfull it was wheel spinning on the rollers...despite having just 200ft lb, it does make you sceptical, especially when youve seen 600 bhp supras on the same rollers running fine, rflmao ! what makes you think it will have high torque ed? personally i would expect lower torque because i know how bad the zs runs without vis and i struggle to believe all that lost torque can be recovered and then some more created just from mapping, why have the vis if it can be mapped out better without it ? i would expect similar or maybe a nadge more torque higher up but less low down and mid range. I have lots of modified zs roller graphs with wheels plots on, so will be interesting to compare torque when the graph is posted here. Last edited by Quadcam24; 18-05-12 at 09:59 PM.