View Single Post
Old 13-09-12, 10:49 AM   #11
guru
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Naaaaaarwich
Posts: 52
guru will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by KirkJames View Post
I take it it's just the cost that's the plus then. I always thought you got more. 50+ mpg for a 180 is certainly better than normal. I get about 30 if you look at my sig!

I do the same amount of miles a day and get anywhere between 285-320 miles per tank and it costs me roughly 65 quid each tank so 21 quid less per tank for more miles might make sense for me. Providing there is no loss in power at all!
It depends on the conversion, on my ZT-T there is a slight noticeable loss in power when it hits gas however that has an older Landi Renzo system which isn't as good. The ZS had a very up-to-date Prins system and there genuinely no difference in power between gas and petrol and the only way you can tell it's changed is by looking at the switch.

The important thing to remember is that not all LPG conversion or systems are the same.
__________________
Guru - aka James!
Current Fleet
1991 mk1c Rover Sterling
2003 mk1 ZT-T with LPG
2004 mk2 ZS 180 with LPG
1999 Jeep Grand Cherokee with LPG
guru is offline   Reply With Quote