|
16-10-13, 08:21 PM
|
#1
|
Who watches the Watchmen?
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,572
|
There were a lot of family cars back in 2001 when the 180 came out that were faster, so now it's a fore gone conclusion! To be fair, and not wishing to down anyone's cars here (as i own a 180 after all!) the ZS180 never was fast!! 0-60 in 7.3? Yeah, dead fast!! Mid range is average at best, top end is poor too. A couple of weeks back i borrowed a 6 year old Audi S3 that had been breathed on a bit. Now that was fast, it would make mince meat of any MG ever made, puny SV-R included. I don't think you can state that since the 6R4 their has ever been a fast MG, not even the ZT260 was fast. Asthmatic is a better description!! They might be a bit quicker than the average car (I'm talking ZR160, ZS180, ZT190, ZT260 - sorry, but below them the average van will beat you) but we need to face facts, MG's are not fast and most family cars wont just keep up, they'll show us a clean pair of heels!
__________________
------------------------------
------------------------------
|
|
|
16-10-13, 08:28 PM
|
#2
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Forest
Posts: 1,409
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat C
There were a lot of family cars back in 2001 when the 180 came out that were faster, so now it's a fore gone conclusion! To be fair, and not wishing to down anyone's cars here (as i own a 180 after all!) the ZS180 never was fast!! 0-60 in 7.3? Yeah, dead fast!! Mid range is average at best, top end is poor too. A couple of weeks back i borrowed a 6 year old Audi S3 that had been breathed on a bit. Now that was fast, it would make mince meat of any MG ever made, puny SV-R included. I don't think you can state that since the 6R4 their has ever been a fast MG, not even the ZT260 was fast. Asthmatic is a better description!! They might be a bit quicker than the average car (I'm talking ZR160, ZS180, ZT190, ZT260 - sorry, but below them the average van will beat you) but we need to face facts, MG's are not fast and most family cars wont just keep up, they'll show us a clean pair of heels!
|
Other comparable cars at the time of the ZS 180 were slower
ST220 Mondeo - 7.6s
V6 Vectra - 8s
Just to name a couple
__________________
Mercedes Vito
|
|
|
17-10-13, 09:34 AM
|
#3
|
Site Ambassador
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Scottish borders
Posts: 11,539
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat C
There were a lot of family cars back in 2001 when the 180 came out that were faster, so now it's a fore gone conclusion! To be fair, and not wishing to down anyone's cars here (as i own a 180 after all!) the ZS180 never was fast!! 0-60 in 7.3? Yeah, dead fast!! Mid range is average at best, top end is poor too. A couple of weeks back i borrowed a 6 year old Audi S3 that had been breathed on a bit. Now that was fast, it would make mince meat of any MG ever made, puny SV-R included. I don't think you can state that since the 6R4 their has ever been a fast MG, not even the ZT260 was fast. Asthmatic is a better description!! They might be a bit quicker than the average car (I'm talking ZR160, ZS180, ZT190, ZT260 - sorry, but below them the average van will beat you) but we need to face facts, MG's are not fast and most family cars wont just keep up, they'll show us a clean pair of heels!
|
Can't compare a ZS with an S3 Audi. An average van .... Rubbish.
__________________
------------------------------
------------------------------
__________________
------------------------------
------------------------------
|
|
|
17-10-13, 09:55 AM
|
#4
|
Technical Expert R.I.P.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,239
|
I don't see how you can compare the zs whose spec is as the same as it was in 2001 and has been out of production since 2005, with a car built in 2007 that probably cost a great deal more £££ than a zs.
Having made the above statement the 180 always felt short of a few bhp to me, and I'm sure had MGR had a decent budget available they'd have addressed that issue.
__________________
------------------------------
------------------------------
__________________
It never got fast enough for me
Hunter S Thompson
R.I.P. Peter David Scott 18.07.59 to 21.11.16
Will be missed by us all but we will always remember you.
|
|
|
17-10-13, 10:19 AM
|
#5
|
Site Ambassador
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort William
Posts: 5,458
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by petet16
I don't see how you can compare the zs whose spec is as the same as it was in 2001 and has been out of production since 2005, with a car built in 2007 that probably cost a great deal more £££ than a zs.
Having made the above statement the 180 always felt short of a few bhp to me, and I'm sure had MGR had a decent budget available they'd have addressed that issue.
|
Have to say I agree with all the above, I am aware of exactly what the ZS is and its limitations. It is of a different era compared to latest generation hot hatches so I expect them to show me a clean pair of heels
Also going from a ZS with breathing mods to a standard one alway has me thinking how much they feel strangled so that as we know is easy to rectify.
__________________
------------------------------
------------------------------
__________________
Metro VVC
|
|
|
17-10-13, 11:26 AM
|
#6
|
Site Ambassador
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Scottish borders
Posts: 11,539
|
Cards on the table - I've been looking at the new breed of hot hatches up to a year old.
208 GTi - Fiesta ST 180 - Polo GTi - Fabia VRS - Clio sport.
All of them are around 180 brake - but none any better just under 7 seconds 0-60. Where they do seem better is in terms of refinement, fuel efficiency and co2.
A Polo GTi's quoted worst fuel consumption is 38.
But ....
All of the above - bar the Fabia - are 15K + That is 10 times the cost of my ZS.
And where we wonder about how ours compare against normal looking maotors, I've been keeping an eye on the MG6s at Motorpoint. On their site I've come across a Focus Zetec, pretty average looking, but it has a 1.6 ecotec turbo 180bhp engine fitted !
__________________
------------------------------
------------------------------
__________________
------------------------------
------------------------------
|
|
|
18-10-13, 07:19 AM
|
#7
|
Who watches the Watchmen?
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,572
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan1971
Can't compare a ZS with an S3 Audi. An average van .... Rubbish.
|
Wasn't comparing the Audi to the MG, i was merely stating that it's the difference between a fast car and an average car. And i'm guessing you havn't driven a modern van? A 1.7tdi Vauxhall Combi or Astramax will easily keep up with or beat a ZR105/ZS110. And my Merc Vito will blast them into the middle of next week. People, honestly you need to realise MG's are just NOT fast, why do you think so many of us resort to tuning the damn things - it's to give us a fleeting chance of keeping up with other cars!!!
__________________
------------------------------
------------------------------
|
|
|
18-10-13, 07:29 AM
|
#8
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: gwent s.wales
Posts: 517
|
kev mocho if you are not too impressed you have a bit of a problem going on there with that car? My old one had a de cat, induction and a re map and was 194bhp on the printout.
As for Rx8's I had a ding dong with one early one morning up a mile or so stretch of motorway and it was embarassing for him.
Don't want to open that old can of worms, but also had a second gear off roundabout tussle with a ctr. Although he was with me for a little while he too was done after a quarter of a mile.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 PM.
|