109 is not quite what i would have expected , having out dragged supercars on track that would deffinitely pull more than 109 mph, then it doesnt really make sense.
However the condition of engine and car when you ran it was different to when i had it, i pamperd it like a baby , since then i have heard its been rather abused.
However i wouldn't call an M3 slow ?....and georges M3 pulled 101 mph at pod so 109 would be quite a crushing defeat for what is rated as one of the best sporting road cars ever made!
I actually think your 60ft time at pod was good for the car ross, if it was set up anything like i had it, then launching was impossible, everything about the car was compromising its ability to get away quickly, and when you are trying to pull a time at pod the launch is everything.
Ive known kev make a 1.9 60ft on normal road tyres, and with that top speed it is deffinitely a car with a high enough power to weight to pull a high 12 second run.........however i doubt anyone could ever do it without changing lots and lots of things on the car.
Its like ive always said then, an extra 10 bhp equates to about 1mph extra on your terminal speed, in which case steves car should pull a top speed over 100 mph and i dont see it tbh. Mine and daves both pulled 99 mph top speed with 210 bhp, so with another 25 bhp steves should go over 100 mph.......and i hope it does !.
Last edited by Quadcam24; 25-08-12 at 07:37 PM.
|