theMGZS.co.uk   Navigation

AboutNews Flyers Forum Events Home

Home
Go Back   theMGZS.co.uk :: MG ZS forum > Technical Area > Build Projects

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 27-04-16, 08:58 AM   #11
Mark S
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,284
Mark S is a name known to allMark S is a name known to allMark S is a name known to allMark S is a name known to allMark S is a name known to allMark S is a name known to allMark S is a name known to allMark S is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by p_b82 View Post
With VNT rather than twin turbos it is easier to keep emissions down if you get the fuel mapping and vane control right-
The issue with a vnt big enough to provide good top end without crudely overspinning it (like one french manufacturer whose cars suffered lots of turbo failures before it was revealed their map overspun the turbo) is getting it going whilst keeping it clean.
The mappers (word used loosely) tend to chuck in more fuel to get it to spool, and they often smoke a little (or a lot) whilst they build boost.

A twin turbo setup on the other hand usually has the small turbo boosting at 1100rpm, crossover around 2500rpm depending on setup and still good strong boost at the high end of the rev band without excessive emp and or emt.

The twin turbo setup typically produces more power for longer with higher ve .
In view of this I struggle to see how a turbo with a smaller window 'is easier to keep emissions down', tyhe manufacturers work hard on emissions regardless of single, twin or triple turbo setup.
Mark S is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ? 2010 theMGZS.co.uk