An upturn in mk1 prices?...............

[LozMachine]

Originally Posted by Nor

Thing is, we mock people who want to sell these cars are higher prices, but why shouldn't they be worth those prices?

Originally Posted by afcbadam

i think the zs is at least as good if not better than all of what i mentioned above. mabye not acceleration wise, but handling wise, its the most practical, has the best sounding engine, and the best looking

Bloody well said

[stamford]

I looked at said car tonight..............bog standard, a bit tired looking and a big dent in the bootlid...............never worth £4295 though, got to admire their front!

[XPCobra]

Originally Posted by R8NMG

Funny how as soon as there is an MG or Rover badge on the bonnet and straight away the car is deemed worthless. When it is a different brand they are suddenly worth alot more but are they really better?

is it not because mg/rover are no longer in buisness?

[Southside_ZS]

Originally Posted by XPCobra

is it not because mg/rover are no longer in buisness?

Even when MG-R were around they've always had a huge depriciation value over here. I remember about ten years ago my dad was looking at a wedge shape Rover 200 SEi. It was only 2 years old and it was alot cheaper than less desirable models of the same age. It had all the electrics, half leather alloy wheels e.t.c. A same age Renault Laguna he also looked at, bottom of the range 1.6 was about 3k more than the Rover

[Stuart]

I just traded my 53 plate Diesel in for £1400 with 104k on the clock, i was expecting much less!! although he did say he would have gave me a grand max if it were petrol!!