theMGZS.co.uk   Navigation

AboutNews Flyers Forum Events Home

Home
Go Back   theMGZS.co.uk :: MG ZS forum > theMGZS.co.uk > General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17-06-14, 10:01 AM   #51
talkingcars
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 10,493
talkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred68 View Post
The KV6 is very sensitive to intake temps. The colder the better.
Agreed, I'll post my findings with O/E and BMC CDA induction.
__________________
Former custodian of the legend that was FE54 - RIP
talkingcars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-06-14, 11:14 AM   #52
petet16
Technical Expert R.I.P.
 
petet16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,239
petet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to behold
The Civic may have speed sensitive steering which may be giving the difference in feel that you're looking for.
Possibly using a different sized pulley on the pas pump might give the desired effect.
__________________
------------------------------
theMGZS.co.uk Admin
------------------------------
__________________
It never got fast enough for me
Hunter S Thompson

R.I.P. Peter David Scott 18.07.59 to 21.11.16
Will be missed by us all but we will always remember you.

petet16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-14, 01:31 PM   #53
dave23572
Member
 
dave23572's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 128
dave23572 is on a distinguished road
One final question about the Janspeed manifolds and sports cat:-

If you fitted these to a 180, would it likely make the fuel economy better or worse?
dave23572 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-14, 01:53 PM   #54
petet16
Technical Expert R.I.P.
 
petet16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,239
petet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to behold
Worse without a doubt
__________________
------------------------------
theMGZS.co.uk Admin
------------------------------
__________________
It never got fast enough for me
Hunter S Thompson

R.I.P. Peter David Scott 18.07.59 to 21.11.16
Will be missed by us all but we will always remember you.

petet16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-14, 04:05 PM   #55
talkingcars
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 10,493
talkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to behold
The old argument that if you drive at the same speed you will be using less power and therefore less fuel should apply..............
__________________
Former custodian of the legend that was FE54 - RIP
talkingcars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-14, 04:17 PM   #56
petet16
Technical Expert R.I.P.
 
petet16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 9,239
petet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to beholdpetet16 is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by talkingcars View Post
The old argument that if you drive at the same speed you will be using less power and therefore less fuel should apply..............
It should James, but you just know it won't.
__________________
------------------------------
theMGZS.co.uk Admin
------------------------------
__________________
It never got fast enough for me
Hunter S Thompson

R.I.P. Peter David Scott 18.07.59 to 21.11.16
Will be missed by us all but we will always remember you.

petet16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-14, 04:49 PM   #57
easytime
Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 74
easytime is on a distinguished road
Honestly i did not notice any difference to fuel consumption, when bog standard she got about 230 miles to a tank, and I am still getting that 11 years and lots of mods later.
easytime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-14, 06:02 PM   #58
MG ZS STE
Site Supporter
 
MG ZS STE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: West Mids
Posts: 2,420
MG ZS STE is just really niceMG ZS STE is just really niceMG ZS STE is just really niceMG ZS STE is just really niceMG ZS STE is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by easytime View Post
Honestly i did not notice any difference to fuel consumption, when bog standard she got about 230 miles to a tank, and I am still getting that 11 years and lots of mods later.
Should be getting about 100 more than that. Unless your driving it very hard everywhere you go that is.
__________________
------------------------------
theMGZS.co.uk Supporter
------------------------------
__________________
The 180s the one you want, ain't no replacement for displacement.
MG ZS STE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-14, 06:13 PM   #59
dave23572
Member
 
dave23572's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 128
dave23572 is on a distinguished road
My theory was that if the car was faster, you'd be more tempted to drive it fast more often, hence worse MPG.

But if driven normally, standard vs a KV6 with JS manifolds and sports cat, would the economy be different.

ie, the engine wouldn't have to work as hard so would it be more efficient?
Or on the other hand maybe if it's making more power, it's using more fuel.

I guess without hard data, you'd just have to take a punt.
dave23572 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-06-14, 06:14 PM   #60
talkingcars
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 10,493
talkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to beholdtalkingcars is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by MG ZS STE View Post
Should be getting about 100 more than that. Unless your driving it very hard everywhere you go that is.
I'm lucky to get 220 with my regular commute.
__________________
Former custodian of the legend that was FE54 - RIP
talkingcars is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ? 2010 theMGZS.co.uk