As some of you know my RR test came out at 214bhp They've said they'll do another RR for free, though if it comes out at 214bhp again I'll have to pay for it. Seems pretty fair.
My car has a green filter and cat back, so unless the stars are aligned the same as last time, it shouldn't be near 214bhp.
Sounds odd to me... and if what people say about RR's depending on the user i think i can see you having to pay.
__________________
------------------------------
------------------------------
__________________
"People in cars cause accidents. Accidents in cars cause people. Drive only with proper protection."
"You should try one. It's bloody good" - Jeremy Clarkson (commenting after driving a ZS180)
"Fines are a tax for doing bad, Taxes are a fine for doing good" - Unknown GPS - Because guys don't know how to ask directions
MG ZS 180
3.5L V6 Ford Taurus
2.7L V6 EcoBoost Ford F150 4x4
Happy with the results today. Dyno measured bhp at 185 and torque (ft/lbs) at 144.5 so it is down on power (torque) low down. Whole reason for going there in the first place
Will stick the graph up later and hopefully some clever folk can have a stab at what might be causing it Torque curve is pretty linear.
i think thats possibly wrong again, if your making 185 bhp you must have the torque up there aswell. to get bhp you need the torque!
on my first rolling road about 2 months ago mine made 183.3 bhp and 185 ft/lb of torque.
on another set of rollers after a few tweeks car made 192.5bhp with 172 ft/lb. and thats with a nackered plenum.
no rolling road is 100% accurate but this gives you a guide that the torque should be up there if the bhp is.
They've said they'll do another RR for free, though if it comes out at 214bhp again I'll have to pay for it. Seems pretty fair.
Linear Mode
